ClientEarth’s position on fuel subsidies in the fisheries sector

ClientEarth’s position on fuel subsidies in the fisheries sector

ClientEarth’s position on fuel subsidies in the fisheries sector

 Harmful subsidies in fisheries artificially increase profits by reducing the cost of fishing and/or by  increasing fishers’ revenue, resulting in overcapacity and overfishing.  

  • Fuel exemptions are harmful subsidies that reduce the costs of fishing and therefore lead to an  increase of fishing capacity. In a situation where stocks are not at sustainable levels, fuel  exemptions contribute to overfishing. By reducing the costs of fishing, fuel subsidies also  contribute to keeping people in the sector artificially, wastefully delaying an inevitable economic  transition.  
  • Fuel exemptions in the fisheries sector should be eliminated through the revision of the Energy  Taxation Directive (ETD).  Fuel exemptions should also be tackled in the framework of the World Trade Organisation (WTO)  negotiations on elimintating harmful fisheries subsidies.  
  • Eliminating fuel exemptions is compatible with – indeed is part of – making fisheries in Europe  sustainable.  
  • Support should be redirected to low-impact fishers in Europe, who are simultaneously the most  vulnerable and vital.  
  • The first step is to give favourable access to our fisheries to small-scale, low-impact fishers,  including access to quotas, which to them means accessing the very resources that allow them  to make a living.  
  • In order to achieve environmental sustainability in EU fisheries, support should be designed to target small-scale fisheries that operate in a way that minimises their impact on the environment.

Download pdf: ClientEarth’s position on fuel subsidies in the fisheries sector 

Share this article

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Bottom Trawler Playa de Menduina EU bottom trawler the Playa de Menduina active in the North Atlantic. Bottom-trawling boats, the majority from EU countries, drag fishing gear weighing several tonnes across the sea bed, destroying marine wildlife and devastating life on underwater mountains - or 'seamounts'. Greenpeace ship Esperanza tours Atlantic waters searching for and intercepting bottom trawling fishing vessels during a campaign to highlight the destruction caused by this controversial form of fishing. Credit line: © Greenpeace / Kate Davison

Briefing: What if adopting the Energy Taxation Directive was a mitigation action under UNCLOS?

Without the elimination of fossil fuel subsidies from our economies, we will not be able to reach climate objectives under EU law or broader climate objectives under the Paris agreement, in order to ensure a decent future for the planet and humankind in the coming decades. Last December’s COP28 climate summit underlined the urgent need to transition away from fossil fuels and the phasing out of inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that do not address energy poverty or just transitions.

Energy transition and Decarbonisation of the fishing fleet: the Low Impact Fishers of Europe (LIFE)’s Perspective

Energy transition and Decarbonisation of the fishing fleet: the Low Impact Fishers of Europe (LIFE)’s Perspective

Shifting from fossil fuel dependency to a zero carbon economy is as imperative for fisheries as it is for other production sectors. Decarbonisation must also be coherent with the other processes affecting the fisheries sector, and in line with fishery management objectives. Decarbonisation must not be pursued at the expense of biodiversity conservation, nature restoration, and the transition towards a fair and sustainable food system. On the other hand, if the vision of the fisheries of the future is well framed and the energy transition is well aligned with the CFP objectives to end overfishing, conserve and restore the marine environment, and is consistent with the objectives of achieving economic, social and employment benefits, it could provide a great opportunity to revitalise the small-scale low impact fishing sector, and give them prospects of future.